孔压静力触探与扁铲侧胀试验在上海软黏土中的应用研究
摘要:依托上海轨道交通市域线机场联络线岩土工程勘察项目，开展了孔压静力触探试验与扁铲侧胀试验，并获取了高质量取样压缩试验结果，研究了不同试验、不同图表分类方法对土层分类效果的影响，分析了扁铲侧胀试验与超固结比、锥尖阻力与压缩模量的关系。研究表明：孔压静力触探图表法对上海软黏土的分类效果较好，而对于过渡型土体（粉土）和“混合土”则分类不理想，扁铲侧胀试验分类方法则能达到良好的分类效果；上海地区软黏土在埋深18.0 m以内具有明显的超固结性，超固结比随着深度的增加而减小，变化差异较大，埋深大于18.0 m的土则为正常固结土；不同类型的软黏土，锥尖阻力与压缩模量之间存在着明显的线性相关关系，并可用统一公式表达。
Abstract:Based on the geotechnical engineering survey project of Shanghai Rail Transit Airport connecting line, the piezocone penetration test and flat dilatometer test were carried out, and the high-quality sampling compression test results were obtained. The effects of different tests and different chart classification methods on the classification effect were studied, and the relationship between flat dilatometer test and over consolidation ratio, cone tip resistance and compression modulus were analyzed. The results show that the chart method of pore pressure static cone penetration test has a good classification effect on Shanghai soft clay, but it is not ideal for transition soil (silt) and "mixed soil", and the classification method of flat dilatometer test can achieve a good classification effect. The soft clay is overconsolidation soil while the burial depth is less than 18.0 m in Shanghai area. Its overconsolidation ratio decreases with the depth increase, and the soft clay is normally consolidated soil while the burial depth is greater than 18.0 m. For different types of soft clay, there is an obvious linear correlation between cone tip resistance and compression modulus, which can be expressed by a unified formula.
中文标题：
孔压静力触探与扁铲侧胀试验在上海软黏土中的应用研究
Application of Piezocone Penetration Test and Flat Dilatometer Test in Shanghai Soft Clay
作者：
陆顺
Lu Shun
作者简介:陆 顺，男，1983年生，汉族，江苏镇江人，硕士，主要从事地质工程研究。E–mail: heduanfen1428088@163.com
通讯地址：
上海市政工程设计研究总院（集团）有限公司，上海 200092
ShanghaiMunicipalEngineeringDesignInstitute(Group)Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai200092,China
中图分类号:TU 413
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2022.06.013
出版物：岩土工程技术
收稿日期:2021-08-30
刊出日期:2022-12-08
关键词:孔压静力触探,扁铲侧胀,上海软黏土,土类划分,超固结比,压缩模量
Key words:piezocone penetration test,flat dilatometer test,Shanghai soft clay,soil classification,OCR,compression modulus
文档包含图片数量：图片(8)张
文档包含表格数量：表格(4)个
参考文献：
[1]武朝军. 上海浅部土层沉积环境及其物理力学性质[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2016.
[2]周念清,李 丹,尹家春,等. 长江口饱和软黏土多静力因子耦合响应规律[J]. 华北水利水电学院学报,2020,41(1):83-89.
[3]任士房,曾洪贤. 深层孔压静力触探技术的应用研究[J]. 工程勘察,2018,46(4):7-11.
[4]姚 萌. 崇明东滩吹填区软土微观结构特征与渗透系数变化机理研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2020.
[5]倪 静,朱丛薇,韩玉琪,等. 上海黏土固结特性及其各向异性的试验研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报,2020,128(11):78-84.
[6]张 硕. 考虑小应变刚度特性的超固结结构性黏土本构模型及应用研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2019.
[7]任士房,曾洪贤. 基于圆形弹性薄板模型求解扁铲侧胀试验侧向基床系数[J]. 路基工程,2019,(3):30-35.
[8]耿功巧,陈 妍,蔡国军,等. 基于CPTU原位测试的深基坑工程中黏性土静止土压力系数的评价研究[J]. 工程勘察,2019,(9):1-6.
[9]高彦斌. 两种K0固结土样的强度比及其各向异性[J]. 同济大学学报:自然科学版,2019,47(5):634-639.
[10]冷 建. 循环荷载下结构性上海黏土的力学特性研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2018.
[11]肖 玮. 基于扁铲侧胀试验与静力触探试验的砂土应力历史研究[J]. 土工基础,2020,34(4):147-151.
[12]ROBERTSON P K. Interpretation of cone penetration tests — a unified approach[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2009,46(11):1337-1355.
[13]MOSS R E S,SEED R B,KAYEN R E,et al. CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2006,132(8):1032-1051. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:8(1032)
[14]唐飞跃. 基于扁铲侧胀试验材料指数的岩土类别研究[J]. 土工基础,2020,48(3):109-111, 130.
[15]高彦斌,陈忠清. 上海地区软黏土的OCR及地质成因[J]. 岩土工程学报,2017,39(S2):79-82. doi: 10.11779/CJGE2017S2020
[16]《工程地质手册》编委会. 工程地质手册(第五版)[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2018.
[17]MARCHETTI S, MONACO P, TOTANI G, et al. The flat dilatometer test (DMT) in soil investigations — a report by the ISSMGE Committee TC16[C]. Reprinted in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on the Flat Dilatometer, Washington D. C., 2006: 7-48.
[18]魏道垛,胡中雄. 上海浅层地基土的前期固结压力及有关压缩性参数的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,1980,2(4):13-22. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.1980.04.002
基金项目：
- 文件大小:
- 3.63 MB
- 下载次数:
- 60
-
高速下载
|
|
