澳门地区全风化花岗岩抗剪强度指标的取值
摘要:以澳门地区31组全风化花岗岩（CDG）的基本物理指标和三轴固结不排水剪试验数据为依据，分析全风化花岗岩的剪切特性和抗剪强度指标的取值。试验结果表明，澳门地区全风化花岗岩应力–应变曲线总体呈应变软化型，孔隙水压力在最大偏应力出现前达到峰值后开始下降，随着黏粒含量的减少下降速度加快，最终可能出现负值。剪胀问题导致澳门全风化花岗岩的剪切强度破坏标准不能仅以主应力差的峰值一种方式取值，总结了3种取值方式，并将黏粒含量作为剪切强度取值的指导性指标，为全风化花岗岩选取强度参数提供新的思路，对提高取值的可靠性有一定帮助。
Abstract:Based on the basic physical parameters and triaxial consolidation undrained shear test results of 31 groups of completely decomposed granite (CDG) in Macao, the shear characteristics and the value of the shear strength index of completely decomposed granite were analyzed. The test results show that the stress-strain curve of the completely decomposed granite in Macao is generally strain-softening, the pore water pressure reaches a peak before the maximum deviatoric stress occurs and then begins to decrease, with the decrease of the clay content, the rate of decrease accelerates, and eventually a negative value may appear. It is inappropriate to take the peak value of the principal stress difference as the shear strength failure standard of Macao completely decomposed granite because of the shear expansion problem. 3 value methods were summarized, and the clay content was selected as a guiding index for the value of the shear strength. A new idea is provided for the selection of strength parameters of completely decomposed granite and is helpful to improve the reliability of the value.
中文标题：
澳门地区全风化花岗岩抗剪强度指标的取值
Determination of Shear Strength Index of Completely Decomposed Granite in Macao
作者：
荣艳丽,陶旭光
Rong Yanli,Tao Xuguang
作者简介:荣艳丽，女，汉族，1982年生，大学本科，高级工程师，注册土木工程师（岩土）。E-mail：rongyanli@ccccltd.cn
通讯地址：
中交第三航务工程勘察设计院有限公司，上海 200032
CCCCThirdHarborConsultantsCo.,Ltd.,Shanghai200032,China
中图分类号:TU 458
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2023.06.016
出版物：岩土工程技术
收稿日期:2022-08-11
修回日期:2022-10-21
录用日期:2023-05-06
刊出日期:2023-12-08
关键词:全风化花岗岩CDG,剪切特性,固结不排水剪强度指标,强度破坏标准,黏粒含量
Key words:completely decomposed granite,shear properties,consolidated undrained shear strength index,strength failure criteria,clay content
文档包含图片数量：图片(3)张
文档包含表格数量：表格(2)个
参考文献：
[1]赵建军,王思敬,尚彦军,等. 香港全风化花岗岩饱和直剪试验中的剪胀问题[J]. 工程地质学报,2005,(1):44-48.
[2]赵建军,王思敬,尚彦军,等. 全风化花岗岩抗剪强度影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学,2005,(4):624-628.
[3]尚彦军,岳中琦,赵建军,等. 全风化花岗岩抗剪强度试验结果对比及影响因素分析[J]. 工程地质学报,2004,(2):199-207. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2004.02.015
[4]温 勇,杨光华,汤连生,等. 广州地区花岗岩残积土力学特性试验及参数研究[J]. 岩土力学,2016,37(S2):209-215.
[5]王 清,蒋惠忠,唐大雄. 闽南三角地区花岗岩残积土及其工程地质特性的研究[J]. 福建地质,1990,(2):90-99.
[6]GB 50021—2001 岩土工程勘察规范(2009年版)[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
[7]DBJ 13—84—2006 岩土工程勘察规范(福建省地方标准)[S]. 福州: 福建科学技术出版社, 2006.
[8]香港特别行政区岩土指南. Guide To Retaining Wall Design[S]. Geotechnical Engineering Office, 1993.
[9]JTS 13—2013 水运工程岩土勘察规范[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2013
[10]GB/T 50123—2019 土工试验方法标准[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2019.
[11]刘祖德. 土的抗剪强度的取值标准问题[J]. 岩土工程学报,1987,9(2):11-19.
基金项目：
- 文件大小:
- 1.07 MB
- 下载次数:
- 60
-
高速下载
|
|
